Methodology

How we calculate SDA market signals from official NDIS housing data, and what each one means.

Data Source

All figures are derived from the NDIA SDA Enrolled dwellings and NDIS demand data quarterly releases. This is official government data published by the National Disability Insurance Agency.

We do not scrape third-party websites, make estimates, or use machine learning predictions. Every number you see comes directly from NDIS data.

How SDA Places Are Calculated

The NDIA publishes enrolled SDA dwelling counts by SA3 region, broken down by maximum number of residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6+ residents per dwelling). We calculate total places — the maximum physical capacity — by multiplying the number of dwellings in each category by the maximum number of residents they can accommodate.

Example: If a region has 10 dwellings for 1 resident, 5 for 2 residents, and 3 for 3 residents, total places = (10 × 1) + (5 × 2) + (3 × 3) = 29 places.

Important nuance: Not all places are economically equivalent. SDA provider income per place depends on the participant's funded building type and design category. Under the NDIA's "lower of" rule, providers receive the lesser of the participant's plan SDA funding amount or the dwelling's enrolled maximum per-participant price. If a participant's funding does not match the dwelling type, the provider receives the lower amount. Our places figure represents physical capacity, not economic capacity.

Supply/Demand Gap Calculation

Formula: SDA Places − Total Demand (in use + eligible)

  • Positive value (Oversupply): More SDA places available than eligible participants. May indicate difficulty filling vacancies.
  • Negative value (Shortfall): More eligible participants than SDA places. May indicate unmet demand.
  • Zero (Balanced): Supply roughly matches demand.

Utilisation Rate

Formula: Participants Currently Using SDA ÷ Total SDA Places

  • High (70%+): Most places are occupied. Indicates strong demand and successful tenant matching.
  • Medium (50-70%): Moderate occupancy. Some mismatch or developing market.
  • Low (<50%): Many vacant places. May indicate oversupply or mismatch between available housing and participant needs.

Market Assessment Classifications

Undersupplied

Eligible demand exceeds estimated places by 20 or more. Gap is places minus demand, so this is a gap of minus 20 or lower.

Moderately undersupplied

Eligible demand exceeds estimated places by 5 to 19 (a gap from minus 19 to minus 5).

Balanced

Eligible demand and estimated places are within about 5 of each other (a gap from minus 4 to plus 5).

Oversupplied

Estimated SDA places exceed eligible demand by 6 or more.

No enrolled supply

No enrolled SDA places recorded, but eligible participants live in this region.

Market signal

The market signal names the data combination behind each code. It is not an instruction. Demand under 5 eligible participants uses the balanced or low-demand signal, before the other rules.

  • Undersupplied with high utilisation. Undersupplied assessment and high confidence (utilisation 70% or higher).
  • Undersupplied with moderate utilisation. Undersupplied assessment and medium confidence.
  • Undersupplied with low utilisation. Undersupplied assessment and low confidence.
  • Moderate shortfall with high utilisation. Moderately undersupplied assessment and high confidence.
  • Moderate shortfall with moderate or low utilisation. Moderately undersupplied assessment and medium or low confidence.
  • Eligible demand with no enrolled supply. No enrolled places, and at least 5 eligible participants.
  • Balanced, or fewer than 5 eligible participants. Balanced assessment, or eligible demand under 5.
  • Estimated supply exceeds demand. Oversupplied assessment.

Confidence Score

The confidence score adjusts the market assessment based on utilisation rate:

  • High: Utilisation is 70% or higher, so the assessment is well supported by occupancy.
  • Medium: Utilisation is 50 to 70%, or the area has little existing supply.
  • Low: Utilisation is below 50% despite a demand gap, which can mean a mismatch between dwellings and participant needs.

Design Category Breakdown

The NDIA publishes SDA demand and dwelling counts broken down by design category: Improved Liveability, High Physical Support, Robust, Fully Accessible, and Basic (legacy category — no longer available for new builds).

Because the per-category data does not include a resident-count breakdown, we estimate places at the national average of 2.3 residents per dwelling, rounded down to the nearest whole number. The shortfall for each category is then calculated as demand minus estimated places.

This estimate is less precise than the region-level places figure (which uses actual resident-count data), but it provides a useful directional signal for which design categories are undersupplied in a given region.

Build Status Breakdown

We also present a breakdown of enrolled SDA dwellings by build status: Existing, New Build, New Build (Refurbished), and Legacy.

Legacy dwellings are properties enrolled before the current SDA framework and are being phased out over time. The build status mix indicates how mature the SDA supply in a region is and whether new stock is entering the market.

Limitations & Caveats

  • Data is updated quarterly by the NDIS. Market conditions may change between releases.
  • Pipeline data (under-construction dwellings) is not included in current supply counts.
  • Some participants may have design category data missing or misclassified.
  • Regional data at SA3 level may not capture local variations within suburbs.
  • Places represent physical capacity. Actual provider income varies based on the match between a participant's funded dwelling configuration/design category and the dwelling's enrolled classification.
  • Design category places are estimated using a national average (2.3 residents per dwelling) and may not reflect actual resident counts in specific categories or regions.
  • The AI market assistant uses third-party AI technology. Its responses may contain inaccuracies and should not be relied upon without independent verification.
  • This tool provides market information only and does not constitute investment advice.